<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>recallposse.org &#187; Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.recallposse.org/tag/supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.recallposse.org</link>
	<description>Allowing more of the same is NOT an option</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 16:30:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How About It Senators? Looking For A New Job Yet?</title>
		<link>http://www.recallposse.org/2009/07/how-about-it-senators-looking-for-a-new-job-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.recallposse.org/2009/07/how-about-it-senators-looking-for-a-new-job-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confirmation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sotomayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recallposse.org/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Confirmation hearings for supreme court justice nominee Sonia Sotomayor continue.. The Republican Senate reminds us how much change is coming perhaps? Judge Sotomayor’s Opinions Were Reversed, Vacated, Or Criticized Nine Out Of Ten Times By The U.S. Supreme Court She is an offhand reject of the court already..  I&#8217;ll bet a couple of whoopee cushions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Confirmation hearings for supreme court justice nominee Sonia Sotomayor continue..</p>
<p>The Republican Senate<a title="Reversed 9 of 10 times" href="http://republican.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Blogs.View&amp;Blog_Id=8427932e-b3ee-4482-a622-455f0579721b" target="_blank"> reminds us how much change </a>is coming perhaps?</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Judge Sotomayor’s Opinions Were Reversed, Vacated, Or Criticized Nine Out Of Ten Times By The U.S. Supreme Court</em></p></blockquote>
<p>She is an offhand reject of the court already..  I&#8217;ll bet a couple of whoopee cushions wind up under a conservative butt or two if she gets to occupy this open seat.</p>
<p>Malkin is <a title="Day Two Sotomayor" href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/07/14/day-two-sotomayor-and-ritual-reassurances/" target="_blank">following the hearings </a>as well..</p>
<blockquote><p>And Sotomayor will be one cleared hurdle closer to overcoming yet another set of “incredible odds” to complete her “compelling personal story.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah.. compelling..  But of course even us average joes might have a compelling story or two.  But it seems the odds are in favor of a new flavor.  Certainly we couldnt have a justice appointed on the basis of respect for law, or even the constiitution, but rather one gets appointed to &#8220;color&#8221; for the purpose of &#8220;coloring&#8221; more fully one of the more important positions in the land.</p>
<p>So much for the blind eye of justice.</p>
<p>Which senators need  a spanking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.recallposse.org/2009/07/how-about-it-senators-looking-for-a-new-job-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
